Тонущих в Средиземном море моряков российского сухогруза Ursa Major отказалось принимать на борт шедшее под флагом Норвегии судно Oslo Carrier 3. Об этом сообщили РИА Новости в пресс-службе компании «Оборонлогистика», которая является владельцем российского судна.
The main conceptual idea of the text is the alleged refusal of a Norwegian ship, Oslo Carrier 3, to rescue the crew of the Russian cargo ship Ursa Major which was sinking in the Mediterranean Sea.
The text highlights the following points:
* Norway's refusal: The Russian company "Оборонлогистика" claims Oslo Carrier 3 refused to take on board the crew of Ursa Major, citing an unspecified "ban".
* The disaster: Ursa Major sank on December 23rd between Spain and Algeria while en route from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok. 14 crew members were rescued, but two are still missing.
* Terrorist attack accusations: "Оборонлогистика" accuses an unnamed entity of carrying out a terrorist attack on Ursa Major, pointing to a 50cm x 50cm hole found on the vessel's starboard side.
The text raises questions about the circumstances surrounding the sinking and the Norwegian ship's decision, suggesting a potential cover-up or political motivation behind the refusal to rescue.
The main conceptual idea of the text is the alleged refusal of a Norwegian ship, Oslo Carrier 3, to rescue the crew of the Russian cargo ship Ursa Major which was sinking in the Mediterranean Sea. The text highlights the following points: * Norway's refusal: The Russian company "Оборонлогистика" claims Oslo Carrier 3 refused to take on board the crew of Ursa Major, citing an unspecified "ban". * The disaster: Ursa Major sank on December 23rd between Spain and Algeria while en route from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok. 14 crew members were rescued, but two are still missing. * Terrorist attack accusations: "Оборонлогистика" accuses an unnamed entity of carrying out a terrorist attack on Ursa Major, pointing to a 50cm x 50cm hole found on the vessel's starboard side. The text raises questions about the circumstances surrounding the sinking and the Norwegian ship's decision, suggesting a potential cover-up or political motivation behind the refusal to rescue.
